Optimization of Investment Portfolio of Chinese Enterprises Driven by Financial Market Phase Change Prediction: Coupling Application of TOPSIS and Markowitz Model

Authors

  • Yuxin Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/tmp34m55

Keywords:

Financial market phase transition, Chinese enterprises, portfolio optimization, TOPSIS model, Markowitz model

Abstract

The current financial market is affected by interest rate adjustments, policy changes, and other factors, resulting in frequent phase transitions. Chinese funded enterprise investment portfolios are facing problems such as income fluctuations and difficulty in risk management. Traditional optimization models are difficult to adapt to dynamic market environments. This article focuses on the phase transition characteristics of financial markets and the investment allocation needs of Chinese enterprises. It proposes an optimization scheme that couples TOPSIS and Markowitz models. Firstly, TOPSIS multi index screening is used to adapt assets, and risk parameters are adjusted based on phase transition prediction. Then, relying on the Markowitz model, weight optimization is completed to form a closed-loop system of "screening adjustment configuration". By sorting out the laws of market transformation, analyzing the limitations of a single model, clarifying the coupling logic and verifying the adaptability in combination with industry historical data, it provides an operational path for Chinese enterprises to achieve controllable portfolio risk and stable returns in volatile markets. Research has shown that coupled models can compensate for the shortcomings of traditional methods in considering multiple objectives and ignoring market fluctuations. They are in line with the investment preferences of Chinese enterprises for low risk and stable returns, and have strong practical application value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fauzi, N. A. M., Ismail, M., Jaaman, S. H., & Kamaruddin, S. N. D. M. (2019, April). Applicability of TOPSIS Model and Markowitz Model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1212, No. 1, p. 012032). IOP Publishing.

[2] Michaud, R. O., & Ma, T. (2001). Efficient asset management: a practical guide to stock portfolio optimization and asset allocation.

[3] Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of financial Economics, 17(2), 223-249.

[4] Kynigakis, I., & Panopoulou, E. (2022). Does model complexity add value to asset allocation? Evidence from machine learning forecasting models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(3), 603-639.

[5] Cont, R., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2000). Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets. Macroeconomic dynamics, 4(2), 170-196.

[6] Deng, H., Li, Y., & Lin, Y. (2023). Green financial policy and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104381.

[7] Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 357-384.

[8] Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and economic development of economy, 20(1), 165-179.

[9] Jondeau, E., & Rockinger, M. (2006). Optimal portfolio allocation under higher moments. European Financial Management, 12(1), 29-55.

[10] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The journal of finance, 51(1), 55-84.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, Y. (2025). Optimization of Investment Portfolio of Chinese Enterprises Driven by Financial Market Phase Change Prediction: Coupling Application of TOPSIS and Markowitz Model. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 5(3), 41-44. https://doi.org/10.54097/tmp34m55