Action, Space, and the Construction of Gender Common Sense: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Vocabulary Example Sentences in University English Teacher's Manuals

Authors

  • Biwen Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/qczc2s65

Keywords:

English Textbooks, Teacher's manuals, Critical Discourse Analysis, Gender Representation

Abstract

As a key vehicle for institutionalized educational discourse, textbooks' vocabulary example sentences serve as a crucial arena for the naturalization of ideology. This study employs Fairclough's critical discourse analysis framework, specifically its common sense construction perspective, to systematically examine the distribution patterns of gendered activity types and spatial configurations within vocabulary example sentences in collage English teacher's manuals. Employing a combined approach of quantitative content analysis and qualitative interpretation, this study developed a nested coding framework integrating Activity-Specific Classification (ASC) and Spatial-Domain Classification (SDC) to analyze 327 gender-related action sentences from a collage English teacher's manuals. Findings reveal: First, gender differences manifest not in action occurrence but in systematic activity type allocation—males predominantly engage in developmental and goal-oriented activities, while females tend toward social and emotional activities. Second, sentences exhibit stable gendered spatial configurations, with males occupying higher proportions of public domains like professional and educational spaces, while females are predominantly positioned in private spaces such as domestic and leisure settings. Third, by depicting routine actions of both genders within fixed spatial settings, the sentences naturalize specific gender orders as common-sense knowledge in daily life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Dahmardeh Mahdi, Mohammed Hasan Aveen, Muhammadi Poune & Al-Rashdi Fathiya. (2025). A comparative study of gender representation in EFL coursebooks in the Middle East. Journal for Multicultural Education, 19(1), 108-120

[2] Azmy, K., Rahman, F., & Muntasir, M. (2024). Discourse in gender studies: how language shapes gender narratives? Saree: Research in Gender Studies, 6(1), 25-38.

[3] Zahra, R., Inawati, I., & Ariffin, K. (2024). Gender representation in Indonesian ELT textbooks: The hidden bias. EDUCATUM Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 37-49..

[4] Nandi, A., Hader, T., & Das, T. (2024). Gender representation in English language textbooks of primary education. Journal of English As A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 61-76.

[5] Mohammed Ismael Ismael, S., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2023). Gender representation in EFL textbooks used in state schools in Northern Iraq and teachers’ perceptions of gender role stereotypes. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6242-6259

[6] Fairclough, N. (2023). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 11-22). Routledge.

[7] Aguilar, J. S. (2021). Gender Representation in EFL Textbooks in Basic Education in Mexico. Mextesol Journal, 45(1), n1.

[8] United Nations Statistics Division. (2016). International Classification of Activities for Time Use Statistics 2016.

[9] Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Weninger, C. (Eds.). (2015). Language, ideology and education: The politics of textbooks in language education. Routledge.

[10] Musty Nicholas. (2015). Teaching Inequality: A study of gender identity in EFL Textbooks. Identity papers: a journal of British and Irish studies, 1(2), 37-56.

[11] Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge.

[12] Moser, C. (2012). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. Routledge.

[13] Blommaert, J. (2008). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Linguistische Berichte, 2008(214), 249-250.

[14] Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of educational research, 75(3), 365-416.

[15] Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language teaching, 33(4), 203-223.

[16] Sunderland, J. (2000). New understandings of gender and language classroom research: Texts, teacher talk and student talk. Language teaching research, 4(2), 149-173.

[17] Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56-80.

[18] Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL quarterly, 18(4), 705-724.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chen, B. (2025). Action, Space, and the Construction of Gender Common Sense: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Vocabulary Example Sentences in University English Teacher’s Manuals. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 5(3), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.54097/qczc2s65