An Exploration of the Internal Pathways for Enhancing the Teaching Competence of Young University Lecturers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/1qxywg62Keywords:
Young University Lecturers, Teaching Competence, Internal Pathway, Reflective Practice, Professional DevelopmentAbstract
Young university lecturers constitute the vanguard of higher education development, with their teaching competence directly influencing the quality of talent cultivation. Against the backdrop of increasingly robust external training support systems, exploring the endogenous drivers and pathways for enhancing their capabilities has become particularly crucial. This paper, grounded in reflective practice theory and considering the career development characteristics of young university lecturers, systematically explores intrinsic pathways for enhancing their teaching competencies. The research posits that the essence of teaching competency enhancement lies in a continuous, self-directed process of professional growth, with the core intrinsic pathway being the deepening of reflective practice. Specifically, this can be achieved through: - Fostering metacognition about teaching practices via systematic teaching journaling; - Realising the creative integration of teaching theory and personal practice through sustained action research; - Expanding professional horizons through dialogue and observation within reflective learning communities; - Ultimately attaining autonomous and sustainable teaching competence by developing personal practice theories. This research provides theoretical reference and practical guidance for young university lecturers to overcome professional development bottlenecks and achieve endogenous growth.
Downloads
References
[1] Bie Dunrong, Yi Mengchun. The Reality of China's Higher Education Development and Policy Responses [J]. Research on Chinese Higher Education, 2018(1): 4–10.
[2] Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
[3] Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath and Company.
[4] O’Connell, T. S., & Dyment, J. E. (2011). The case of reflective journals: Is the jury still out? Reflective Practice, 12(1), 47–59.
[5] Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
[6] Lave, J., & Wenger, A. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
[7] Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.
[8] Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. Teachers College Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Social Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









