Artificial Intelligence Drives the Governance Reform of Graduate Education: Theoretical Logic, Practical Dilemma and Innovation Breakthrough
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xvqxmy43Keywords:
Artificial intelligence empowerment; graduate education; modern governance; digital transformation.Abstract
In the digital age, artificial intelligence has deeply integrated into the governance of graduate education, providing new impetus for optimizing training models. However, in practice, challenges such as data governance barriers, technical ethical risks, and insufficient adaptability of stakeholders are encountered. For instance, data silos hinder precise training, and technological dependence undermines educational value. This study, grounded in constructivist learning theory, technology acceptance model, collaborative governance theory, and risk society theory, constructs an analytical framework and proposes innovative pathways: driving scenario innovation through technology integration, building adaptive platforms and data middleware; reconstructing a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance model to strengthen digital literacy and ethical norms; creating a data-driven governance loop. Future efforts should balance technological empowerment with humanistic care, promoting the transition of governance towards "intelligent coexistence," thereby facilitating high-quality educational development.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Zhe and Xia Qingquan. The Dissolution and Reconstruction of the Roles of Graduate Students and Teachers by Generative Artificial Intelligence [J]. Graduate Education Research, 2023(5):48-54.
[2] Yang Qingwang and Tang Qian. Generative AI Empowering Graduate Education: Theoretical Logic, Legal Risks, and Governance Paths [J]. Graduate Education Research, 2025, (02):26-33.
[3] Yang Qingwang, Tang Qian. Generative AI Empowering Graduate Education: Theoretical Logic, Legal Risks, and Governance Paths [J]. Graduate Education Research, 2025, (02):26-33.
[4] Shi Wen and Liu Yanru. Opportunities, Challenges, and Synergistic Paths of Artificial Intelligence in Basic Education [J]. Language and Education Research, 2025,9 (02):22-29.
[5] Rose. Shortage of AI education teachers (manifestations of the shortage of AI education teachers) [EB/OL]. ChatGPT online trial, 2024-05-03 [2025-06-08]. http://chatgpt.cmpy.cn/article/6385773.html
[6] Liu Xiya. Basic education should enhance the scientific application of AI-Sora's explosive popularity challenges traditional educational models, NPC representative Liu Xiya proposes AI + education [EB/OL]. Beijing News, 2024-03-07 [2025-06-08]. http://edu.ycwb.com/2024-03/07/content_52542959.htm
[7] Lu Bingrong. Some Thoughts on the Development of Basic Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence [J]. People's Education, 2025, (05):64-65.
[8] Sweet. Theoretical Logic and Ethical Study on Empowering Personalized Learning Paths with Artificial Intelligence [J]. Journal of Hunan Post and Telecommunications Vocational College, 2024,23 (03):65-69+85.
[9] Cao Yanglu and Xie Zhongxin. Promoting the Regional Practice of Artificial Intelligence Empowering Basic Education: A Case Study of Pudong New Area, Shanghai [J]. Primary and Secondary School Information Technology Education, 2025, (03):12-15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Social Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









