Exploration of the Application of "BOPPPS+PBL" Teaching Mode in The Basic Course of Circuit Analysis

Ranran Zhou

doi:10.54097/rwejg795

Authors

Ranran Zhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/rwejg795

Keywords:

Models of teaching, BOPPPS, PBL, Fundamentals of circuit analysis.

Abstract

In response to the common problems of insufficient learning initiative and lack of engineering application and practical ability among college students in the course of "Fundamentals of Circuit Analysis", this study focuses on cultivating high-quality applied innovative talents, deeply integrating the effective teaching structure of the "BOPPPS" model with the "PBL" teaching concept, and constructing a "BOPPPS+PBL" hybrid teaching mode. This model relies on the Rain Classroom intelligent teaching tool and combines professional characteristics to innovate and practice the teaching objectives, content, activities, and evaluation of the course, aiming to stimulate students' learning motivation, strengthen their ability to analyze and solve complex engineering problems, effectively improve the quality and effectiveness of classroom teaching, and provide a reference path for the teaching reform of basic engineering courses in universities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] H. S. Barrows, A. C. Myers. Problem-based learning in secondary schools[J]. Unpublished monograph, 1993.

[2] Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.

[3] Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

[4] Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 21-29.

[5] Woods, D. R. (1996). Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. McMaster University.

[6] Ladewski, B. G., & Alper, J. S. (2017). Instructional Design Frameworks: BOPPPS and Beyond. Routledge.

[7] Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.

[8] Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.

[9] Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. In Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning (pp. 5-15). Purdue University Press.

[10] Azer, S. A. (2009). Problem-based learning in the fifth, sixth, and seventh grades: Assessment of students' perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1033-1042.

[11] Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44-58.