A Review of the Relationship Between Sensory Encoding and Lexical Encoding from the Perspective of Working Memory Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/3badtg76Keywords:
Working memory; sensory encoding; lexical encoding; phonological loop; multimodal; language development; vocabulary acquisition.Abstract
The acquisition and retention of linguistic knowledge are based on two main processes, namely sensory encoding and lexical encoding, although their developmental relation and the working memory architecture regulating this link are not yet well understood. This research analyses the multicomponent working memory model, in particular the phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad, in the context of the interplay of modality-specific sensory information with lexical representations as a function of age. Drawing on longitudinal developmental studies, studies on the modality effect, studies on multisensory integration and L2 acquisition, the paper argues for systematic developmental change at the sensory-lexical interface in working memory: the initial dependence on auditory sensory encoding is gradually replaced by more flexible, multimodal lexical representations as the capacity of phonological working memory and the ability for strategic encoding develops. The episodic buffer is suggested as the fundamental convergence point between multi-sensory coding and long-term lexical knowledge with ramifications for vocabulary education and future study.
Downloads
References
[1] Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201.
[2] Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
[3] Hitch, G. J., Allen, R. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2025). The multicomponent model of working memory fifty years on. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 387–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021824131425
[4] Cowan, N. (2022). Working memory development: A 50-year assessment. Cognition, 224, 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105075
[5] Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90022-Q
[6] Kuribara, K. (2026). Revisiting the effects of phonological short-term memory on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. ITL — International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 176, 1–32.
[7] Gordon-Salant, K. A., Sommers, J. B., & Zobel, J. M. (2020). Modality effects on lexical encoding and memory representations of spoken words. Ear and Hearing, 41, 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001546
[8] Havy, M. (2024). Toward an auditory dominance in early word learning. First Language, 44, 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/01425694231224653
[9] Havy, M., & Floccia, J. (2018). The role of auditory and visual speech in word learning at 18 months. Developmental Science, 21, e12480. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12480
[10] Cowan, N., Blume, J. S., & Saults, E. M. (2024). Attention-sharing in the development of audiovisual working memory. Developmental Science, 27, e13552. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13552
[11] Louwerse, M. M., Stein, C., Briner, E., & Connell, J. (2025). From senses to memory during childhood: A meta-analysis of multisensory processing and WM development. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 15, 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15030157
[12] Arslan, C., Schneider, D., Getzmann, S., Wascher, E., & Klatt, L.-I. (2025). Multisensory processing and attention in working memory: Audiovisual object storage. Psychophysiology, 62, e70018. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70018
[13] Camos, K., & Barrouillet, P. (2011). Working memory in development: A dual-component model. Developmental Psychology, 47, 914–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023736
[14] Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0545-y
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Social Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









