Analysis of the Practice of Human-Machine Collaborative Translation from the Perspective of Cognitive Load

Shuhuai Yang

doi:10.54097/fa64ay89

Authors

Shuhuai Yang School of Foreign Languages and International Communication, the College of Arts and Sciences·Kunming, Kunming, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fa64ay89

Keywords:

Cognitive load; Human-machine collaborative translation; Post-editing; Eye-tracking; Cognitive resources allocation.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technology has gradually expanded the scope of applications for translation, and at the same time, the cognitive features of translation activities have also changed. Translators no longer complete the translations alone but work with machines. Cognitive Load Theory can be used to study the cognitive processing process of humans and machines in collaboration. Based on the above theory, this paper explores the characteristics of cognitive load for translators in human-machine collaborative translation, traces the application of this theory in translation research, and compares the cognitive differences under different collaboration modes. This paper takes Chen Lei's (2025) eye-tracking data as its reference, shows the gradual changes in cognitive load over time, and explores how translation direction and task difficulty affect cognitive load. Based on the above data, the fixation time and the number of regressions for the human-machine collaboration group were both lower than those of the manual translation group. However, this advantage is due to the quality of the machine's initial output and text difficulty. From the perspective of translation direction, the reduction effect of AI assistance in Chinese-to-English translation is relatively more pronounced than that in English-to-Chinese translation. Based on the above findings, this paper proposes the following three improvements: interface Design, skill training and task management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Koehn, P., & Knowles, R. (2017, August). Six challenges for neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Neural Machine Translation (pp. 28–39). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-3204.

[2] Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29–47). Cambridge University Press.

[3] Hvelplund, K. T. (2011). Allocation of cognitive resources in translation: An eye-tracking and key-logging study. Copenhagen Business School.

[4] Daems, J., & Macken, L. (2020). Post-editing human translations and revising machine translations: Impact on efficiency and quality. In Translation revision and post-editing (pp. 50–70). Routledge.

[5] Yao, Y., Han, T., & Li, D. (2026). Assistance or distraction? A cognitive ergonomics perspective on cognitive load during AI-assisted post-editing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2628994

[6] Chen, L. (2025). Examining cognitive load in human-machine collaborative translation: insights from eye-tracking experiments of Chinese-English translation. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1570929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1570929

[7] Alves, F., & Jakobsen, A. L. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge handbook of translation and cognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127

[8] Liu, Y., Zheng, B., & Zhou, H. (2019). Measuring the difficulty of text translation: The combination of text-focused and translator-oriented approaches. Target, 31(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18036.zhe

[9] Alves, F., Koglin, A., Mesa-Lao, B., Martínez, M. G., de Lima Fonseca, N. B., de Melo Sá, A., Gonçalves, J. L., Szpak, K. S., Sekino, K., & Aquino, M. (2016). Analysing the impact of interactive machine translation on post-editing effort. In M. Carl, S. Bangalore, & M. Schaeffer (Eds.), New directions in empirical translation process research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB (pp. 77–94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20358-4_4

[10] Moorkens, J., & O’Brien, S. (2017). Assessing user interface needs of post-editors of machine translation. In Human issues in translation technology (pp. 127–148). Routledge.

[11] Jia, J., Wei, Z., Cheng, H., & Wang, X. (2023). Translation directionality and translator anxiety: Evidence from eye movements in L1-L2 translation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1120140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1120140