Large Language Model–Assisted Qualitative Analysis: A Case Study of Medical Students with Academic Difficulties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/j3f79k71Keywords:
Large language models; qualitative research; medical students; thematic analysis.Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support qualitative research, yet practical accounts of how they can be incorporated without displacing human interpretation remain limited. This study presents a researcher-supervised workflow for processing and analysing semi-structured interviews with medical students experiencing academic difficulties. Thirty interviews were transcribed, checked against recordings, de-identified, and analysed through three stages: event/theme identification, element-level examination of focal events, and cross-event interpretive construction. The workflow identified recurring difficulties involving unclear learning goals, limited learning resources, professional-identity tension, and family expectations. LLMs supported the organisation of long transcripts and the comparison of related experiences; researchers verified outputs, retained contextual qualifications, and developed the final interpretation. The findings illustrate that LLMs can make qualitative analysis more traceable and efficient when their outputs are treated as provisional analytic material rather than authoritative conclusions. We propose practical safeguards for transcription, privacy, validation, and documentation. This case study offers a concise, reproducible pathway for using LLMs to assist—not replace—qualitative inquiry.
Downloads
References
[1] Aguinis, H., & Solarino, A. M. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
[2] Arlinghaus, C. S., Wulff, C., & Maier, G. W. (2024). Inductive coding with ChatGPT: An evaluation of different GPT models clustering qualitative data into categories. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gpnye
[3] Bano, M., Zowghi, D., & Whittle, J. (2023). Exploring qualitative research using large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.13298
[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[5] Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
[6] Chew, R., Bollenbacher, J., Wenger, M., Speer, J., & Kim, A. (2023). LLM-assisted content analysis: Using large language models to support deductive coding. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.14924
[7] Dai, S.-C., Xiong, A., & Ku, L.-W. (2023). LLM-in-the-loop: Leveraging large language models for thematic analysis. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.15100
[8] De Paoli, S., & Mathis, W. S. (2024). Reflections on inductive thematic saturation as a potential metric for measuring the validity of an inductive thematic analysis with LLMs. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01950-6
[9] Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
[10] Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
[11] Jalali, M. S., & Akhavan, A. (2024). Integrating AI language models in qualitative research: Replicating interview data analysis with ChatGPT. System Dynamics Review, 40(3), e1772. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1772
[12] Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
[13] Li, K., Fernandez, A. M., Schwartz, R., Rios, N., Carlisle, M. N., Amend, G. M., Patel, H. V., & Breyer, B. N. (2024). Comparing GPT-4 and human researchers in health care data analysis: Qualitative description study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e56500. https://doi.org/10.2196/56500
[14] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
[15] Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
[16] Roberts, J., Baker, M., & Andrew, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and qualitative research: The promise and perils of large language model assistance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99, 102722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102722
[17] Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
[18] Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Social Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









