Family Rearing Strategies in the Transformation of Extracurricular Training after "Double Reduction"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gvf10h14Keywords:
Abstract
Under the background of the full implementation of the "double reduction" policy and the accelerated transformation of extracurricular training industry, the family education strategy is facing profound changes and adjustments. This paper focuses on the family education strategy in the transformation of extracurricular training after "double reduction" Through interviews and analysis of the influence of the "double reduction" policy on extracurricular training and family education, it is found that the extracurricular training industry is facing changes, and the concept and behavior of family education are also changing. In this context, middle-class families adopt a variety of parenting strategies, such as attaching importance to quality education, developing private schools, and deepening cooperation between home and school. However, these strategies have both positive effects and some problems in the implementation process, including different influences on children's learning and development, pressures and challenges within the family, and social and policy constraints. This paper further reflects on the "double reduction" policy, puts forward some suggestions on the parenting strategies of middle-class families, such as treating the policy rationally and improving the family education ability, and puts forward some suggestions on improving the education system, such as strengthening the supply of quality education resources and optimizing the cooperation mechanism between home and school, so as to provide reference for the optimization of the parenting strategies under the "double reduction" policy.
Downloads
References
[1] Cai, L. (2022). A Review of Research on Family Education Investment. Social Science Trends (2), 68-78.
[2] Elshanum, D. C. (2024). The Role of Parents in Enhancing Self-Esteem of School-Age Children: Exploring Parenting Styles, Involvement, and Socioeconomic Factors. Acta Psychologia, 3(3), 11-121.
[3] Li, C., Jiang, S., Fan, X., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Exploring the impact of marital relationship on the mental health of children: Does parent–child relationship matter? . Journal of Health Psychology, 25(10-11), 1669-1680.
[4] Maree, J. G. (2022). The psychosocial development theory of Erik Erikson: critical overview. The Influence of Theorists and Pioneers on Early Childhood Education, 119-133.
[5] Men B. L.,& Luo, K. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of home-school cooperation under the background of "double reduction" policy. Educational Theory and Practice, 43(23), 31-34.
[6] Su, Z.Y. (2022). "Love" and "Obstruction" of Family Education under the Policy of "Double Reduction" and Economic Development. Scientific Public: Wisdom Education (2), 0009-0010.
[7] Wang, Y.W., Tian, J.X., Peng, Z.H. & Yao, Z. (2020). How is family education possible: from study, private school to smart family learning environment. Future and Development, 44(01),33-41.
[8] Xu, F.L. (2023). Analysis of the Incidental Effect of the "Double Reduction" Policy Based on the Stakeholder Theory. Yogg, 181-183.
[9] Zhang, Y.P,& Ren, Y. J. (2021). A Summary of Family Education Research from the Perspective of Social Capital and Cultural Capital. Journal of Henan University of Science and Technology: Social Science Edition, 41(2),16-23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education and Social Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.