Social Distance Theory and Its Prospects in Addressing Educational Issues of Migrant Populations

Bo Yang

doi:10.54097/n07e6c50

Authors

Bo Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/n07e6c50

Keywords:

Social distance; Social distance theory; Migrant children.

Abstract

This study focuses on the fundamental concepts and measurement methods of social distance theory, systematically reviewing its theoretical development and major research findings. First, the paper will examine the conceptual origins and theoretical evolution of social distance to clarify its core tenets. Second, it will explore the primary measurement approaches, including the application and development of the Bogardus Social Distance Scale. Finally, the study synthesizes relevant applications of social distance theory in migration research, particularly empirical findings in educational contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Emory S.Bogardus. (1925). Social Distance and it ’s Origin. Journal of Applied Sociology,(9), 216-226.

[2] Entrich, S. R. (2023). Longitudinal studies of migrant educational achievement: Methods and findings. Springer.

[3] Guo, X. (2019). Intergenerational differences in urban integration willingness among Chinese migrant workers. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 6(1), 1-18.

[4] Hasler, B. S., et al. (2022). Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 423-441.

[5] Hopkins, N., & Loo, Y. J. (2023). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(1), 112-130.

[6] K.H.Wolf,ed. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York:The Free Press, 7.

[7] Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(1), 113–126.

[8] Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D.(2013). Power gets the job:

[9] Lammers, J., Galinsky, A.D., Gordijn, E. H., & Otten, S. (2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 282–290.

[10] Lu, G. (2005). Social distance between rural migrants and urban residents: Institutional discrimination and its consequences. Sociological Studies, (4), 95-110.

[11] Magee, J. C., Galinsky, A. D., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2007). Power, propensitytonegotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 200–212.

[12] Magee, J. C., Milliken, F. J., & Lurie, A. R. (2010). Power differences in theconstrual of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 354–370.

[13] Motti-Stefanidi, F., & Masten, A. S. (2023). Child Development Perspectives, 17(2), 89-95.

[14] OECD. (2022). The resilience of students with an immigrant background: Factors that shape well-being. OECD Publishing.

[15] Otthein Rammstedlt. (1991). On Simmel ’s Aesthetics: Argumentation in Journal Jugend, 1897—1906. Culture&Society,(8), 133.

[16] Park, Y., et al. (2023). Computers & Education, 194, 104699.

[17] Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 776–779.

[18] Robert E. (1950). Park.Race and Culture .New York:The Free Press, 257.

[19] Wang, Y., & Wang, K. (2012). Asymmetric social distance: Evidence from dual-perspective measurements in Nanjing. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 78-94.

[20] Willard C.Poole. (1927). Distance in Sociology. American Journal of Soci- ology,(33), 94-104.

[21] Wu, Z. (1930). Racial attitudes in America: A social distance study. Ethnographic Research Quarterly, 15(2), 45-60.

[22] Xu, C. (2021). Psychological isolation among new-generation migrants: A longitudinal study. Urbanization and Social Change, 8(2), 112-129.

[23] Xu, M. (1985). Interethnic relations in Taiwan: Measuring psychological distance between Han and indigenous groups. Asian Ethnicity, 6(3), 201-215.

[24] Zhang, H. (2010). Bidirectional social distance: Reconceptualizing majority-minority relations. Social Sciences in China, 31(1), 156-170.