Research on the Early Warning Function and Implementation Path for Sustainability Accounting in Corporate Governance

Yifan Liu

doi:10.54097/0rdzbg62

Authors

Yifan Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0rdzbg62

Keywords:

Sustainability accounting, Corporate governance, Early warning function, ESG risks, Implementation path, Risk governance.

Abstract

As global sustainable development progresses, businesses face increasing challenges in the areas of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Against this backdrop, sustainability accounting, through the systematic integration of non-financial information, provides crucial support for companies to establish forward-looking risk early warning mechanisms. This article focuses on the risk identification, assessment, and early warning functions of this mechanism within the corporate governance framework. Research shows that by quantifying ESG performance, identifying key influencing factors, tracking long-term trends, and analyzing them in conjunction with financial data, sustainability accounting can provide early signals of a variety of potential risks, such as pressure to comply with environmental regulations, a lack of social responsibility in the supply chain, damaged corporate reputation, and declining sustainable competitiveness. However, the mechanism remains plagued by a number of bottlenecks in its practical application, including a lack of unified data standards, insufficient management attention, an inadequate audit mechanism, and weak governance embedding. To address these issues, this article proposes a systematic, phased approach: first, defining material issues, establishing unified indicators, and strengthening the integration of internal and external information; then, incorporating sustainability risks into strategic decision-making and establishing independent verification procedures; and ultimately, achieving a deep integration of sustainability performance and corporate value creation. Comprehensively integrating sustainability accounting into corporate governance structures is not only a key measure to enhance organizational resilience and long-term value but also provides a theoretical basis and practical reference for relevant policy formulation and management practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Xiao Hongjun. Criticism, reflection and transcendence of ESG criticism[J]. Economic Management, 2025, 47(07): 183-208. DOI: 10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2025.07.010.

[2] Wang Haifeng, Jia Wenyan, Yang Chen. “Belt and Road” OFDI and corporate ESG performance - empirical evidence from my country's A-share listed manufacturing companies [J/OL]. Journal of Xi'an University of Technology, 1-18 [2025-08-22]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1294.N.20250704.0836.002.

[3] Dai Yizhe. From environment to society: a study on the shift of sustainable design value [D]. Shandong Institute of Arts and Crafts, 2025. DOI: 10.27789/d.cnki.gsdgy.2025.000035.

[4] Shao Tianwei. The impact of carbon information disclosure under the background of “dual carbon” Research on the impact of climate risk on corporate performance [D]. Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics, 2025.

[5] Li Jiahang. Case study of ESG information disclosure of H company [D]. Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences, 2024. DOI: 10.26975/d.cnki.gccks.2024.000131.

[6] Jiang Jieyao, Kuang Ping. Research on the integration of digital intelligence to facilitate high-quality disclosure of carbon accounting information [J]. Exhibition Economy, 2025, (14): 138-141. DOI: 10.19995/j.cnki.CN10-1617/F7.2025.14.138

[7] Deng Wenyueyang. Research on the impact of climate risk on corporate investment and financing behavior [D]. Beijing University of Science and Technology, 2025. DOI: 10.26945/d.cnki.gbjku.2025.000430.

[8] Ma Congwen, Zhan Yong. The impact of US entity list sanctions on corporate collaborative innovation from the perspective of supply chain spillover [J/OL]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 1-11 [2025-08-22]. https://link.cnki.net/url id/42.1224.G3.20250812.1239.002.

[9] Xu Zhiyong, Guo Sichang, Zhang Meng, et al. Government-guided funds and corporate ESG performance: effects and mechanisms [J/OL]. Nankai Management Review, 1-40 [2025-08-22]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1288.F.20250818.2147.014.

[10] Xu Fengmin, Wei Lijun, Jing Kui, et al. Can climate transition risk pressure force corporate green innovation? - Risk decomposition and quantification based on LDA model [J]. Shanghai Economic Research, 2025, (06): 61-75.DOI:10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2025.06.005 .

[11] Deng Wenyueyang. Research on the impact of climate risk on corporate investment and financing behavior [D]. Beijing University of Science and Technology, 2025.DOI:10.26945/d.cnki.gbjku.2025.000430.

[12] Shi Wen. Research on the impact of government audit digitization on urban economic development [D]. Beijing University of Science and Technology, 2025.DOI:10.26945/d.cnki.gbjku.2025.000434.

[13] Gao Tong. Research on the impact of greenwashing behavior of steel enterprises on corporate value [D]. Zhejiang Agricultural and Forestry University, 2024. DOI:10.27756/d.cnki.gzjlx.2024.000633.

[14] Lu Zhen. Case study of green mergers and acquisitions of Hangzhou Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. [D]. Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences, 2025.

[15] Du Tingting. Internal control system and accounting information quality based on modern enterprise governance mechanism [J]. National Circulation Economy, 2018, (21): 101-102. DOI: 10.16834/j.cnki.issn1009-5292.2018.21.055.

[16] She Mingying. Application of financial identification and early warning model in enterprise bankruptcy governance [J]. Finance and Accounting Communications, 2012, (32): 143-144. DOI: 10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2012.32.072.