Analysis of Factors Influencing College Students' Online Learning Satisfaction: A Case Study of University H

Shuanghe Yang

doi:10.54097/kk9dd785

Authors

Shuanghe Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kk9dd785

Keywords:

Online Learning, Learner Satisfaction, College Students, Learner-Centered

Abstract

The rise of the "Internet + Education" model marks the entry of online learning into a phase of rapid development. The establishment of online learning platforms like MOOC, ‌Coursera, and Udemy has led to the widespread application of blended learning on campuses. As the understanding of education deepens, the mere application of technology is no longer the sole criterion for measuring educational quality. Learner satisfaction, as a "learner-centered" evaluation method, is gradually becoming a key factor in assessing educational quality. Therefore, this study aims to analyze, from the learners' perspective, the various factors affecting their online learning satisfaction and explore how these factors interact to collectively influence the learning experience. By systematically analyzing these internal mechanisms, the study seeks to promote the continuous development and optimization of online learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yang Wenzheng, Xiong Caiping, Ding Jihong, et al. Research on Influencing Factors and Mechanisms of Satisfaction with Educational Information Resource Quality [J]. China Educational Technology, 2014, 25(5): 104-112.

[2] Han Yuzhi. The Role of Student Satisfaction Surveys in American University Management [J]. Research in Educational Development, 2006, 24 (03): 62-65.

[3] Xu Xiaohui, Zhao Guoqiang, Liu Min. Construction of a College Student Satisfaction Evaluation Scale [J]. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 2010 (11).

[4] Wang Chun. Investigation and Countermeasure Analysis of Online Course Learning Satisfaction—Taking Case Studies on the Integration of Information Technology and Curriculum as an Example [D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2014.

[5] Liu Wu, Yang Xue. Construction of the Chinese Higher Education Customer Satisfaction Index Model [J]. Journal of Public Management, 2007, 4(1): 84-88.

[6] Ismuratova, G. S., Naurzbaev, B. T., Maykopova, G. S., Madin, V. A., & Ismuratova, R. B.E—learning concept and its main characteristics [J]. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, 11(2), 847-852.

[7] Li, S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. The influence of interactive learning materials on self-regulated learning and learning satisfaction of primary school teachers in mongolia [J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4), 1093.

[8] Yu-Chun Kuo, Brian R. Belland. An exploratory study of adult learners’ perceptions of online learning [J], Minority students in continuing education. 2016, 64(4): 661—680.

[9] Lane Stephen et al. Engagement and Satisfaction: Mixed-Method Analysis of Blended Learning in the Sciences [J]. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2021, 21(1): 100-122.

[10] Xu Xiaohui, Zhao Guoqiang, Liu Min. Construction of a College Student Satisfaction Evaluation Scale [J]. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 2010, 23(11): 55-61.

[11] Li Jiaxin. Research on College Students' MOOC Satisfaction and Influencing Factors—A Case Study of Universities in Nanchang [D]. Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2019.

[12] Chen Li. Teaching Interaction Model and Teaching Interaction Hierarchy Tower in Distance Learning [J]. Distance Education in China, 2004, 21, (05): 24-28.

[13] Chao-Min Chiu, Meng -Hsiang Hsu, Szu Yuan Sun. et al. Usability, quality, value and e—learning continuance decisions [J]. Computer & Education, 2005, 45(4): 399-416.