The Path to Improving the Right to Relief in Small Claims Procedure

Authors

  • Xiaoyu Dai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/p2hdt293

Keywords:

Small claims litigation, right to relief, appeal, retrial

Abstract

With the rapid development of the economy and society, civil legal relations have also exhibited a diversified trend of development. The number of civil cases handled annually has rapidly expanded, placing considerable pressure on courts at all levels. To alleviate the pressure on courts and effectively allocate judicial litigation resources, China established a small claims procedure in 2012. However, the application rate of the small claims procedure in practice is far from the legislator's original intention. There are difficulties in its application, especially for parties seeking rights relief in the application of the small claims procedure, which requires further development and improvement. This article is divided into five chapters. The first chapter clarifies the basic concept and scope of application of the small claims procedure by comparing it with the summary procedure. The second chapter elaborates on the current status of relief in China's small claims procedure, points out the main reasons for parties to small claims to apply for retrial, and discovers that the existing problems in the application of rights relief for parties to small claims in China include the single channel for rights relief in small claims and the insufficient civil procuratorial supervision of small claims. The third chapter compares and analyzes small claims procedures outside China. Based on the summary of the previous three chapters, the fourth chapter proposes practical paths for rights relief from a practical perspective. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, summarizing the main conclusions of the article and pointing out the deficiencies and limitations of the research content.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shujie Qi. Discussion on Several Issues Concerning the Establishment of Small Claims Procedure. Journal of the National Procurators College. 2012, Issue 1, p. 126-134.

[2] Xiuming Liu. Commentary and Enlightenment on Japan's Small Claims Procedure System. Western Law Review. 2013, Issue 5, p. 112.

[3] Ying Fang. Research on the Gradual Expansion of Welfare-Oriented Small Claims Litigation - Taking 'Litigation Source Diversion' as the Starting Point. published in "Law Application".2020, Issue 9, p. 24.

[4] Rui Huang. Research on procedural safeguards for parties in small claims litigation in China [D]. South China University of Technology, 2023.

[5] Yusheng Chen. Reflection and Improvement Path of Small Claims Procedure in China [D]. Guizhou University, 2023.

[6] Chunlan Yuan. A Comparative Analysis of Small Claims Procedures in the Two Major Legal Systems. Hebei Law Journal, Vol. 4, 2005, p. 136.

[7] Xiuming Liu. An Analysis of Japan's Small Claims Procedure and Its Implications. Western Law Review, Vol. 5, 2013, p. 113.

[8] [Taiwan] Liangong Qiu. Modernization of Justice and Procedural Law, San Min Book Co., Ltd., 1992 edition, p. 263-267.

Downloads

Published

21-10-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dai, X. (2025). The Path to Improving the Right to Relief in Small Claims Procedure. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 4(3), 59-61. https://doi.org/10.54097/p2hdt293