Research on Plant-amendment Combined Remediation Technology of Heavy Metals Contaminated Soil

Authors

  • Weiwei Chen
  • Zhe Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/nykpy765

Keywords:

Heavy metals pollution, soil, phytoremediation, soil amendment, combined remediation technology.

Abstract

With the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization, the problem of heavy metal pollution in soil is becoming more and more serious, posing a serious threat to the ecological environment and human health. Phytoremediation technology is valued for its environmental friendliness and cost-effectiveness. In order to provide a scientific basis for the remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil and the promotion of the safe, efficient and sustainable use of heavy metal contaminated cultivated soil, We reviewed the application of plants, amendments, and plant-amendment combinations in the remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils, and The effects of different plants and amendments and their combined application on heavy metal contaminated soil were discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Tsadilas D C, Hu Z, Bi Y, et al. Utilization of coal fly ash and municipal sewage sludge in agriculture and for reconstruction of soils in disturbed lands: results of case studies from Greece and China[J]. International Journal of Coal Science Technology, 2018, 5(1): 64-69.

[2] Jinmiao L, Qiong W, Yu W, et al. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on improvement of degraded landscape soil in an ionized rare earth mining area, subtropical China[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2022, 86(2): 275-292.

[3] Sarwar N, Imran M, Shaheen M R, et al. Phytoremediation strategies for soils contaminated with heavy metals: Modifications and future perspectives [J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 171:710-721.

[4] Zhou Y, Liu X, Wang J. Characterization of microplastics and the association of heavy metals with microplastics in suburban soil of central China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 694: 133798.

[5] Liu C J, Lin H, He P D, et al. Peat and bentonite amendments assisted soil less revegetation of oli gotrophic and heavy metal contaminated nonferrous metal lictailing [J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 287:132101.

[6] Tomczyk B, Siatecka A, Bogusz A, et al.Ecotoxicological assessment of sewagesludge-derived biochars-amended soil [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021,275: 116484.[84] Grobelak A, Placek A, Grosser A,et al. Effects of single sewage sludgeapplication on soil phytoremediation[J. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 155:189-197.

[7] Douay F, Roussel H, Pruvot C, et al. Assessment of a remediation technique using the replacement of contaminated soils in kitchen gardens nearby a former lead smelter in Northern France[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 401(1-3): 29-38.

[8] Gong Y Y, Zhao D Y, Wang Q L. An overview of field-scale studies on remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals and metalloids: Technical progress over the last decade[J]. Water Research, 2018,147:440-460.

[9] Ali H, Khan E, Sajad M A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals-Concepts and applications[J]. Chemosphere, 2013,91(7):869-881.

[10] Li J, Zhang P Y, Ye J P, et al. Simultaneous in-situ remediation and fertilization of Cd-contaminated weak-alkaline farmland for wheat production [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 250: 109528.

[11] Ji P H, Song Y F, Jiang Y J, et al. A two-year field study of phytoremediation using Solanum nigrum L. in China[J]. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2016,18(9): 924-928.

[12] Lebrun M,Nandillon R, Miard F, et al. Effects of biochar, ochre and manure amendments associated with a metallicolous ecotype of Agrostis capillaris on As and Pb stabilization of a former mine technosoI[J]. Environmental Geochemistry andHealth, 2021,43(4): 1491-1505.

Downloads

Published

07-12-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chen, W., & Liu, Z. (2024). Research on Plant-amendment Combined Remediation Technology of Heavy Metals Contaminated Soil. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 1(2), 41-43. https://doi.org/10.54097/nykpy765