Bayesian Inversion-Driven Fairness Optimization for Dance Competitions

Authors

  • Zhoukui Qian
  • Yike Wei
  • Aotian Tu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/d2jc3j87

Keywords:

Bayesian sequential update; Reverse inference; constraint sampling; Ridge returns; Compound ranking.

Abstract

 In order to solve the problems of complete lack of fan voting data and opaque interaction mechanism between judges and audiences in the program "Dancing with the Stars", this paper proposes a three-step algorithm framework. In the first step, a reverse fan inference model based on Bayesian sequential update and Monte Carlo constraint sampling is constructed, and the posterior distribution of fan votes is inverted by using the weekly judge scores and elimination results, and the reproduction accuracy of the model for historical elimination reaches 99.68%, and the estimation uncertainty is quantified. In the second step, a fan-judge composite ranking model is established, Spearman's correlation coefficient and rescue rate index are introduced, and the ranking system and the percentage system are compared, and it is found that the influence of fans and judges under the ranking system is balanced (correlation coefficient 0.88 vs 0.86), while the influence of fans is diluted under the percentage system (0.12), and the judge's life-saving mechanism is more effective in the ranking system. The third step is to propose a multi-dimensional influence model of rule stage perception, and to quantify the contribution of age, industry background, and professional dance partners to judges' scores and fan votes through Ling regression, and define the preference difference Δβ to reveal that the judges are biased towards technology (professional dance partner coefficient is up to 0.81), and fans are biased towards identity (industry background coefficient is up to 0.48), and the differences intensify with the evolution of the competition system. The algorithm framework in this paper provides quantitative decision support for program production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Gelman A, Carlin J B, Stern H S. Bayesian Data Analysis. 3rd ed. CRC Press, 2020.

[2] Robert C P, Casella G. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. Springer, 2021.

[3] Smith J, Johnson M, Lee K. Ranking aggregation in entertainment contests. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2021, 48(5): 887-902.

[4] Lee S, Park J, Kim H. Fan voting dynamics in reality TV. Media Psychology, 2022, 25(3): 412-430.

[5] Brown T, Davis R, Miller D. Inferring hidden preferences from partial rankings. Psychometrika, 2020, 85(2): 345-367.

[6] Garcia R, Martinez L, Lopez F. A Bayesian approach to unobserved voting. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2023, 17(1): 210-233.

[7] Wang L, Tang Y, Liu B. Comparing aggregation rules in sports. Journal of Sports Analytics, 2021, 7(4): 251-268.

[8] Miller D. Judge bias and audience scoring in talent shows. Empirical Economics, 2022, 62(6): 2987-3010.

[9] Chen X, Wu J, Zhao Y. Modeling viewer votes with partial data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2020, 151: 107012.

[10] Davis R. The influence of celebrity on voting outcomes. Celebrity Studies, 2021, 12(2): 178-195.

[11] Martinez L, Zhao F, Wong K. Scoring systems and fairness in competitions. Management Science, 2022, 68(9): 6721-6738.

[12] Wilson H. Comparative analysis of rank and percentage systems. Decision Support Systems, 2023, 165: 113888.

[13] Anderson P, Thompson G, Clark R. Judge save mechanisms in elimination shows. Operations Research, 2024, 72(1): 145-162.

[14] Scott A. Fan preferences for celebrity background. Entertainment Computing, 2023, 44: 100522.

[15] Harris S, Clark L, Lewis R. Technical execution vs. popularity in dance competitions. Dance Research Journal, 2020, 52(1): 56-74.

[16] Lewis R. Professional partner effects on performance scores. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2022, 40(5): 567-580.

[17] King T, Scott A, Turner P. Identity and audience engagement in talent shows. Poetics, 2021, 88: 101563.

[18] Walker B. Celebrity status and voting behavior. Journal of Cultural Economics, 2023, 47(2): 301-320.

[19] Martinez L, Zhao F. Divergence between expert and public opinion. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2024, 50: 100458.

[20] Adams R, Brown T. Dynamic weighting in competitive scoring. European Journal of Operational Research, 2024, 312(2): 655-670.

Downloads

Published

28-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Qian, Z., Wei, Y., & Tu, A. (2026). Bayesian Inversion-Driven Fairness Optimization for Dance Competitions. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 7(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.54097/d2jc3j87