Psychological Contracts in Managerial Decision-Making: How Implicit Expectations Shape Organizational Behavior

Authors

  • Wei Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ekc5em20

Keywords:

Psychological contract; organizational behavior; managerial decision-making; contract breach; perceived organizational support; organizational citizenship behavior; expectancy theory.

Abstract

 Psychological contract - The implicit understanding held by employees concerning the rights and responsibilities they believe they are entitled to under their employer, which forms an indispensable yet invisible part of organizational behaviour. Based on Rousseau's foundational contract theory, Eisenberger et al.'s research on perceived organisational support frameworks and Vroom's expectancy theory to explore how implicit expectations within psychological contracts affect employees' behaviour, managers' choices of plans, and the consequences for organisations. The three mutually related arguments presented below: psychological contract violations do not fit into the traditional model of dissatisfaction but constitute an independent cognitive-attitudinal event with more severe effects and longer durations on work behaviour; In terms of decision-making process, managers' responses serve as key sites for creating or breaking psychological contracts, making effective managerial communication and anticipation crucial factors affecting organisational health; The different ways across cultures that employees perceive their rights under contractual arrangements, interpret them differently, and subsequently react differ from what existing international management theories pay insufficient attention to addressing. The following are recommendations for top management, organizational policies, and future studies on contractual Dynamics during organisational Transformation driven by digitalisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Rousseau DM. Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 1989;2(2):121–139.

[2] Rousseau DM. Psychological and Organizational Contracts. SAGE Publications; 1995.

[3] Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, Sowa D. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986;71(3):500–507.

[4] Vroom VH. Work and Motivation. Wiley; 1964.

[5] Morrison EW, Robinson SL. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review. 1997;22(1):226–256.

[6] Zhao H, Wayne SJ, Glibkowski BC, Bravo J. The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology. 2007;60(3):647–680.

[7] Organ DW. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington Books; 1988.

[8] Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications; 2001.

[9] Restubog SLD, Hornsey MJ, Bordia P, Esposo SR. Effects of psychological contract breach on organizational citizenship behaviour: Insights from the group value model. Journal of Management Studies. 2008;45(8):1377–1400.

[10] Gallup. State of the Global Workplace: 2023 Report. Gallup Press; 2023.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, W. (2026). Psychological Contracts in Managerial Decision-Making: How Implicit Expectations Shape Organizational Behavior. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 7(2), 6-9. https://doi.org/10.54097/ekc5em20