Discussion on Value Logic and Practical Dilemmas of Interaction Design for Digital-Media Games from the Perspective of Digital Education

Authors

  • Yining Mi No. 21, Shijin Huayuan Hutong, Dongcheng District, Beijing, P.R.China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/s03h4g37

Keywords:

Digital game-based learning; interaction design; digital education; serious games; learning analytics; gamification.

Abstract

This paper studies the value logic and practical problems of interaction design for digital-media games from the perspective of digital education. Rather than considering digital games as neutral forms of entertainment, this paper incorporates game interaction design into the discussion of digital game-based learning to explore learning principles embedded in games and present empirical results from serious games and game-based learning outcomes. Based on classical and contemporary literature in digital game-based learning, gamification and learning analytics for educational games, this paper investigates how interaction design can promote meaningful learning, assessment and engagement, and also identifies problems related to curricular alignment, assessment validity, data practices and equity. It is concluded that the value of digital-media game interaction design in education depends on the integration of pedagogical goals, interaction mechanisms and evidence-based optimisation, but no effects beyond those supported by current research are guaranteed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. McGraw-Hill.

[2] Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.

[3] Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004

[4] Byun, J., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game-based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta-analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3–4), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12271

[5] Serrano, K. (2019). The effect of digital game-based learning on student learning: A literature review. Graduate Research Papers, University of Northern Iowa.

[6] Wang, L.-H., Chen, B., Hwang, G.-J., Guan, J.-Q., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students' learning achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12654

[7] Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

[8] Shute, V. J., & Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth assessment in digital games. In D. Ifenthaler, D. Eseryel, & X. Ge (Eds.), Assessment in game-based learning (pp. 31–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_3

[9] Caballé, S., Daradoumis, T., & Xhafa, F. (2014). Application of learning analytics in educational videogames. Procedia Computer Science, 35, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.103

[10] Alexandris, N., Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2021). A systematic literature review of empirical studies on learning analytics in educational games. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(7), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2021.01.004

[11] Wang, L.-H., Chen, B., Hwang, G.-J., Guan, J.-Q., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2022). Effects of digital game-based STEM education on students' learning achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12654

Downloads

Published

22-09-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mi, Y. (2026). Discussion on Value Logic and Practical Dilemmas of Interaction Design for Digital-Media Games from the Perspective of Digital Education. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 8(2), 47-50. https://doi.org/10.54097/s03h4g37