Research on Social Justice Issues and Governance Paths in Urban Climate Resilience Construction

Authors

  • Yinuo Cao School of Project Management, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ijesd.455

Keywords:

Urban Climate Resilience; Social Equity; Environmental Justice; Climate Adaptation Governance; Vulnerable Groups.

Abstract

With a focus on the social equity issues in the construction of urban climate resilience, this paper employs the analytical system of environmental justice and climate equity, draws upon domestic and foreign experiences in urban climate adaptation, and identifies the main problems in social equity at the core of resilience construction. Research has found that the inequity is manifested in five ways: spatial clustering of vulnerable groups and a mismatch in resilience resources; concealment of fairness issues through technical governance paths; lack of voice for disadvantaged groups in community participation; deficit in fairness of adaptation fund allocation; and neglect of fairness dimensions in governance system design. The five types of problems are not independent; rather, they are linked together and work in concert to produce an institutional reproduction of vulnerability. Based on the above analysis, the following paths have been proposed: differentiation of resilience planning, participation-based governance mechanism, fairness-oriented fund allocation system, decision-making framework with fairness assessment, and multi-party collaborative governance network. Transferring the concept of social equity from a secondary consideration to an essential component of resilience-building is necessary to address the conflict between efficiency and fairness in urban climate governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Meerow, S., Pajouhesh, P., & Miller, T. R. (2019). Social equity in urban resilience planning. Local Environment, 24(9), 793–808.

[2] Klopfer, F., & Pfeiffer, A. (2023). Determining spatial disparities and similarities regarding heat exposure, green provision, and social structure of urban areas-A study on the city district level in the Ruhr area, Germany. Heliyon, 9(6).

[3] Parker, C., Mahlasi, C., Govindasamy, T., Radebe, L., Brink, N. B., Jack, C., ... & Makhanya, S. (2025). Quantifying intra-urban socio-economic and environmental vulnerability to extreme heat events in Johannesburg, South Africa. International Journal of Biometeorology, 69(10), 2501–2517.

[4] Guo, A., Yue, W., Yang, J., & Li, M. (2025). Assessing inequality in population exposure of urban heat across China's major cities. Applied Geography, 185, 103788.

[5] Li, J., Li, G., Jiao, Y., Li, C., & Yan, Q. (2024). Association of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and urban heat in China: evidence from Hangzhou. Environmental Research, 246, 118058.

[6] Zhan, X. (2025, July). Depoliticizing urban water management: Governance, justice, and the Sponge City Initiative in China [Conference paper]. AESOP Annual Congress 2025, Istanbul, Turkey. https://congress.aesop-planning.eu/event/1/contributions/1067/

[7] Kim, S. K., Cho, H., Wu, L., & Guan, C. (2026). The gentrification paradox of green–blue adaptation in African cities. Nature Cities, 1–9.

[8] Lao, X., & Istrate, A. L. (2026). Addressing Vulnerability to Urban Heat Stress Through Community Engagement: A Systematic Scoping Review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 17(2), e70052.

[9] The Nature Conservancy. (2026). Climate action in urban villages: Exploring resilient community practices in Shiyan Subdistrict, Shenzhen. https://tnc.org.cn/content/details27_1885.html

[10] Ecology and Environment Bureau of Shenzhen Municipality. (2025, May 28). Shenzhen launches climate-resilient community pilot: Upgrading ecological facilities to reduce heat island effect. https://meeb.sz.gov.cn/xxgk/qt/hbxw/content/post_12199331.html

[11] Cities Alliance. (2024). Climate finance for the urban poor: A review of global climate funds. Cities Alliance/UNOPS.

[12] New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. (2025). Clean Water, Clean Air and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act: Fiscal year 2024–2025 annual report. https://extapps.dec.ny.gov/fs/programs/BondActNYS/CWCAGJ-Environmental-Bond-Act-FY-2024-25-Annual-Report.pdf

[13] Gao, H., Xu, B., Pourmostaghimi, T., Zhang, G., & Van Zandt, S. (2025). Sponge City for whom? Leveraging Social Vulnerability Index for extreme flood adaptation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 107068.

[14] Shangguan, Z. (2026). Floating risk and individual responsibility: The restructuring of urban climate adaptation in China under population urbanization. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 104423.

[15] Brousseau, J. J., Stern, M. J., Pownall, M., & Hansen, L. J. (2024). Understanding how justice is considered in climate adaptation approaches: a qualitative review of climate adaptation plans. Local Environment, 29(12), 1644–1663.

Downloads

Published

10-11-2026

Issue

Section

Articles