Diffusion-Based Generative Image Technologies for Urban Cultural Heritage: New Shifts in Public Perception of Authenticity and Cultural Cognition.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ijesd.458Keywords:
Diffusion models; urban cultural heritage; perceived authenticity; cultural cognition; digital interpretation; provenance.Abstract
This paper studies how diffusion-based generative image technology may change public perception of authenticity and cultural cognition in urban cultural heritage interpretation. To avoid viewing generative digital technology as limitless, this paper will focus on text-to-image and image-to-image diffusion systems for generating, modifying and diversifying visual representations of historical streets, buildings and urban areas. This paper presents concepts and practices; it does not conduct original research through data collection of visitors or other empirical evidence to support the conclusions. According to the doctrine of conservation, the theory of authenticity, media theory, digital heritage guidance and technical literature, it is proposed that generative images shift the concept of authenticity from an apparently self-evident visual attribute to a judgment about evidence, provenance, uncertainty and institutional trust. They provide comparisons and questions, but photorealism may also conceal speculation and reduces controversial urban history. Therefore, the responsible workflow should separate records from hypotheses, disclose the generation process, keep the source link, mention communities, and not present them as fact by virtue of visual plausibility.
Downloads
References
[1] ICOMOS. (1965). International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites (The Venice Charter 1964).
[2] ICOMOS. (1994). The Nara document on authenticity.
[3] MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1086/225585
[4] Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00103-0
[5] Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. MIT Press.
[6] Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840–6851.
[7] Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10674–10685. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042
[8] ICOMOS. (1996). Principles for the recording of monuments, groups of buildings and sites.
[9] UNESCO. (2003). Charter on the preservation of digital heritage.
[10] ICOMOS. (2008). Charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites.
[11] Denard, H. (Ed.). (2009). The London charter for the computer-based visualisation of cultural heritage (Version 2.1).
[12] UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape, including a glossary of definitions.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Social Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









