Professional Development Needs Based on the Mode of Delivery

Authors

  • Jiayang Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kab64919

Keywords:

Professional development needs, professional development programs, mode of delivery, online teaching, China.

Abstract

The rapid shift from traditional classroom teaching to online and hybrid learning environments has highlighted the need for effective professional development (PD) programs to support educators. This study aims to identify the key PD needs of educators adapting to various modes of teaching delivery, evaluate the effectiveness of current PD programs, and offer recommendations for improvement. Using a quantitative survey design, data were collected from 56 educators at S College in China. The findings reveal that educators prioritize customized PD programs, collaborative learning opportunities, and ongoing support to address challenges such as technology integration, online course design, and student engagement. While current PD programs are generally effective, there is a need for greater alignment with educators' specific needs and more sustained support. The study concludes with actionable recommendations, including the development of learner-centered PD initiatives, the promotion of collaborative learning, and the provision of continuous professional support. These recommendations are grounded in the theoretical frameworks of Andragogy, Social Learning Theory, and Experiential Learning Theory, offering valuable insights for institutions aiming to enhance teaching quality in digital learning environments. This study contributes to the broader discourse on online education by addressing critical gaps in PD and providing practical strategies to support educators in the evolving landscape of higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ali, N. S., Hodson-Carlton, K., & Ryan, M. (2002). Web-based professional education for advanced practice nursing: A consumer guide for program selection. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 33(1), 33-38.

[2] Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[3] Barker, A. M. (2002). A case study in instructional design for Web-based courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 23(3), 183-186.

[4] Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158.

[5] Brennan, R. (2003). One size doesn't fit all: Pedagogy in the online environment---Volume 1. Leabrook, Australia: National Center for Vocational Educational Research.

[6] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[7] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

[8] Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22.

[9] Elliott, M., Rhoades, N., Jackson, C. M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Professional development: Designing initiatives to meet the needs of online faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 1-20.

[10] Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge.

[11] Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering pre-service teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185-200.

[12] Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[13] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[14] Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315.

[15] Leary, H., Dopp, C., Turley, C., Cheney, M., Simmons, Z., Graham, C. R., & Hatch, R. (2020). Professional development for online teaching: A literature review. Online Learning, 24(4), 254-275.

[16] Parsons, S. A., Hutchison, A. C., Hall, L. A., Parsons, A. W., Ives, S. T., & Leggett, A. B. (2019). US teachers' perceptions of online professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82(1), 33-42.

[17] Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers' perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 19-30.

[18] Roy, M., & Boboc, M. (2016). Professional development needs of online teachers. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(3), 283-302.

[19] Sieber, J. (2005). Misconceptions and realities about teaching online. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 329-340.

[20] Van Der Velde, R. J., & Rawl, C. D. (2000). Building a faculty development institute: A case study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(4). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter34/vandervelde34.html

[21] Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Downloads

Published

20-02-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chen, J. (2025). Professional Development Needs Based on the Mode of Delivery. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 2(1), 117-121. https://doi.org/10.54097/kab64919