Evaluation System of Scientific Research Performance of Humanities and Social Sciences Teachers in Chinese Universities: Taking Tianjin University of Sport as an Example

Wentao Deng

doi:10.54097/1xmadt44

Authors

Wentao Deng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/1xmadt44

Abstract

This study takes Tianjin S University as an example to conduct an in-depth study on the research performance evaluation system of humanities and social science teachers in Chinese universities. Through comprehensive quantitative and qualitative methods, the advantages and existing problems of the evaluation system were comprehensively analyzed. Research has found that the current evaluation system emphasizes the number of papers, project topics, and the level and quantity of rewards, but there is still a lack of recognition of diverse research contributions. It is recommended to further improve the system, expand the scope of academic contribution evaluation, and promote more comprehensive scientific research performance evaluation. This study collected multi-dimensional data on papers, topics, awards, etc., and classified them according to different professional titles. Bayesian algorithms were used to train and establish classification models, providing a relatively mechanical classification reference for optimizing the performance evaluation system of scientific research in Chinese universities. It helps to promote the comprehensive development of educational research in the field of humanities and social sciences. By providing useful insights for decision-makers, administrative managers, and teachers, this study aims to promote the continuous improvement of the research performance evaluation system in Chinese universities, thereby creating a more favorable environment for academic progress and knowledge innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Qiu, L., Guo, M., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2017). Research Efficiency Evaluation of Higher Agricultural Colleges Based on DEA and Malmquist. Modern Education Management, 2017(02), 50-55.

[2] Zhong, J. (2020). Dynamic Evaluation of Research Performance in Chinese Universities: An Analysis Based on Panel Data of Five Types of Universities (2012-2016). Educational Research, 2020(02), 58-61.

[3] Cao, G., Cui, X., Bai, L., & Gao, S. (2019). Analysis of Research Performance of "Double First-Class" Universities in the Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shanghai Region Based on Malmquist Index. Economic Observation, 2019(09), 18-20.

[4] Zhang, J., Li, J., Chen, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). Research on Research and Innovation Performance Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Universities in the Yangtze River Delta. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020(09), 80-87.

[5] Gu, P., Xia, X., Wu, X., Bai, L., & Zhong, Y. (2017). Construction of Research Evaluation Index System for Universities. Library and Information Service, 2017(09), 94-101.

[6] Zhu, Y., & Sun, X. (2019). Design of the Research Performance Evaluation Index System for Universities. Journal of Huaihai Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2019, 17(05), 93-97.

[7] Liu, F., & Yu, Z. (2019). Research on University Research Performance Evaluation Index System Based on DEA. Jiangsu Science and Technology Information, 2019(36), 26-29.

[8] Liu, C., Zhou, X., & Liu, L. (2017). Evaluation of University Technological Innovation Efficiency Based on Super-Efficiency DEA Model. Science and Technology & Economy, 2017, 30(05), 21-26.

[9] Liu, X., Du, H., & Yan, L. (2018). Performance Evaluation of Intellectual Property Rights Capability in "985" Universities in China. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018(02), 65-74.

[10] Ruan, H., & Zhao, X. (2019). Evaluation of Technological Innovation Efficiency Based on PCA/DEA Model: A Case Study of Shandong Universities. Eastern Forum - Journal of Qingdao University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019(03), 94-98.

[11] Chen, Y., & Liang, X. (2020). Analysis of Research Performance of Directly Affiliated Universities of the Ministry of Education: Based on Principal Component Analysis and DEA-Malmquist Index Model. Journal of Jimei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 23(04), 69-78.

[12] Zong, X., & Fu, C. (2019). Research on Research Performance and Its Influencing Factors of Research Universities in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on Relevant Data of Directly Affiliated Universities of the Ministry of Education. Higher Education Management, 2019, 13(05), 26-35.

[13] Ma, L. (2018). Evaluation of Research Performance of Research Universities Based on Malmquist Index Model. Statistics and Decision, 2018, 34(22), 68-70.

[14] Wang, X., Zheng, Z., & Li, X. (2017). Optimization and Empirical Analysis of Research Performance Evaluation System in Universities: A Case Study of 19 Universities in Fujian Province. China University Science and Technology, 2017, (11), 68-71.

[15] Guo, X., Chen, L., & Zhai, H. (2017). Research on Research Performance Evaluation of Universities in Heilongjiang Province. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 2017, (07), 50-53.

[16] Liu, T., & Xu, H. (2018). Analysis of Research Input-Output Performance and Its Influencing Factors in Different Regions of China: An Empirical Study Based on DEA-Tobit Model. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(13), 113-118.

[17] Duan, X. (2019). Super-Efficiency DEA Evaluation of Research Performance of Universities in China under System Thinking. Journal of Systems Science, 2019, (04), 51-54.

[18] Weng, Q. (2017). Efficiency Trends in Research, Teaching, and Social Services of Chinese Universities: A Case Study of 72 Directly Affiliated Universities of the Ministry of Education. Contemporary Educational Science, 2017, (10), 81-86.

[19] Zhang, E., & Shi, W. (2020). Characteristics and Reference of Research Performance Evaluation System for Humanities and Social Science Teachers in American Universities. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Social Science), 2020, 44(01), 98-104. DOI:10.19496/j.cnki.ssxb.2020.01.015.

[20] Zhang, E., & Shi, W. (2022). Optimization Study on the Evaluation System of Research Performance for Humanities and Social Science Teachers in Local Universities. Scientific Management Research, 2022, 40(03), 76-82. DOI:10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2022.03.009.

[21] Cui, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Reflection and Reconstruction of Research Productivity Evaluation of Social Science Teachers in Universities. Higher Education Management, 2020, 14(06), 50-59. DOI:10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20201104.006.

[22] Ji, Q. (2018). Research Hotspots and Development Trends of Research Performance Evaluation in Humanities and Social Sciences in Chinese Universities. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(18), 43-49.

[23] Liu, K. (2020). Analysis of the Reform Direction of Research Evaluation System in Humanities and Social Sciences from the Perspective of Yin and Yang. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), 2020, 20(01), 101-107. DOI:10.16112/j.cnki.53-1160/c.2020.01.013.

[24] Wu, T., & Yang, J. (2022). Construction of an Evaluation System for Research Talents in Philosophy and Social Sciences. China Social Science Evaluation, 2022, No.31(03), 145-156+160.

[25] Xue, E., Tian, S., & Li, J. (2022). Doctoral Cultivation System and Mechanism of University Think Tank in China. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2022. DOI:10.1080/00131857.2022.2042205.

[26] Ke, Q. (2022). Research on the Issue of Research Performance Evaluation of A University's Teachers under the Background of "Double First-Class". (Doctoral dissertation, Beijing University of Chemical Technology). DOI:10.26939/d.cnki.gbhgu.2022.000454.

[27] Cui, J. (2020). Current Situation and Development Trend Analysis of Research Performance Evaluation in Philosophy and Social Sciences in Universities in China. Heilongjiang Education (Higher Education Research and Evaluation), 2020, No.1312(04), 49-51.

[28] Jones, A. (2021). Scientometric Evaluation of Highly Cited Scientists in the Field of Forensic Science and Legal Medicine. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2021. DOI:10.1007/s00414-021-02671-y.

[29] Chen, Y., & Mo, T. (2020). Research on the Evaluation System of Teaching and Research Staff in French Universities. Journal of Nanhua University (Social Science Edition), 2020, 21(01), 94-103. DOI:10.13967/j.cnki.nhxb.2020.0014.

[30] Su, J. (2020). Correlation Analysis of Peer Review and Impact Factor in the Evaluation of Journals in Humanities and Social Sciences. Library and Information Knowledge, 2020, No.195(03), 128-137. DOI:10.13366/j.dik.2020.03.128.

[31] Suo, C., & Yu, M. (2021). Review of Innovation Trends in Peer Review of Journal Articles Abroad. Library and Information Work, 2021, 65(01), 128-139. DOI:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.01.018.

[32] Jiang, G. (2020). Exploration of a New Model of Peer Review for Scientific Papers from the Perspective of Applied Philosophy. Journal of Editing, 2020, 32(06), 648-651. DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2020.06.015.

[33] Huang, C., & Kang, L. (2021). Several Methods to Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Peer Review. Journal of Editing, 2021, 33(01), 78-81. DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.01.018.

[34] Suo, C., & Li, Y. (2023). Evolution of Peer Review from the Perspective of Evaluation Theory. Information Studies: Theory & Application [Online]. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20230103.0922.001.html.

[35] Bland, C. J., Center, B. A., Finstad, D. A., Risbey, K. R., & Staples, J. G. (2005). A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine, 80(3), 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200503000-00003

[36] Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.11.001

[37] Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002

[38] Brew, A., Boud, D., & Namgung, S. U. (2011). Research productivity and the internationalization of academic staff. Higher Education, 61(6), 679-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9349-z

[39] Gonzalez, C., & Bernard, H. (2006). Academic workload and faculty job satisfaction: A study of the relationship between workload and satisfaction in a sample of university faculty. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 633-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9008-5

[40] Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429-431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

[41] Kinman, G., & Jones, F. (2008). A life beyond work? Job demands, work-life balance, and wellbeing in UK academics. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 17(1-2), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350802165469

[42] Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2010). The impact factor’s Matthew Effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 424-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21232

[43] Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359

[44] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

[45] Stephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674069583

[46] Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099

[47] Zhang, E. M., & Shi, W. B. (2020). Characteristics and reference of the research performance evaluation system for humanities faculty in American universities. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020(1).

[48] Chen, S. (2019). Research methods handbook [Chinese version]. Beijing: People's Publishing House.

[49] Wang, X. M. (2018). On the application of big data in the field of artificial intelligence. Technology and Industry, 18(10), 50-54.