The Coupling Relationship Between Language Landscape and Rural Revitalization: Taking Four Language and Writing Demonstration Villages in Huzhou as An Example

Authors

  • Yuannan Lu
  • Lei Lei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/xn15ej68

Keywords:

Language landscape; rural revitalization; cultural heritage; rural governance.

Abstract

This study explores the coupling relationship between language landscape and rural revitalization through four language and writing demonstration villages in Huzhou, China. Based on the collection and analysis of approximately 800 effective language landscape corpus samples, the research identifies four underlying logics connecting language landscape construction with rural revitalization. Findings demonstrate that language landscapes function as cultural carriers inheriting local traditions while creating innovative cultural expressions; they enhance communication efficiency and strengthen social cohesion; they serve as governance tools transmitting policies and values; and they drive economic development through distinctive rural branding and related industries. The study concludes that language landscape construction should be guided by local characteristic culture while absorbing excellent foreign influences, balance standardization with local distinctiveness, support modernized rural governance, and maximize economic potential through innovative applications in cultural and creative industries. These findings provide theoretical and practical implications for leveraging language landscapes to promote comprehensive rural revitalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] An, R., and Zhang, Y. Y. Language choice and identity construction: linguistic landscape of Jianghan Road in Wuhan[J].Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2024, 45(10):4236-4253.

[2] Lamb, G. Multispecies language landscapes[J].Linguistic Landscape, 2024, 10(4):370-399.

[3] Li, Y., Lee, H., and Choi, B. Developing beginning language learners' (meta-)cultural understanding via student-led Linguistic Landscape research [J]. Linguistic Landscape-an International Journal, 2022, 8(1):56-84.

[4] Napawan, N. C., Chamorro, L., and Guenther, D., et al. Decolonizing the Language of Landscape Architecture [J]. Landscape Journal, 2023, 42(1):109-129.

[5] Rohmah, Z., and Wijayanti, E. Linguistic landscape of Mojosari: Language policy, language vitality and commodification of language [J].Cogent Arts & Humanities, 2023, 10(2):2275359.

[6] Sung, C. Towards an acceptance of the ideology of English as a lingua franca in Hong Kong? An examination of the myriad ideologies underpinning the perceptions of English within the complex local language ideological landscape[J].English Today, 2023, 39(1):61-67.

[7] Yang, J., Yang, R. X., and Chen, M. H., et al. Effects of rural revitalization on rural tourism[J].Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2021, 47:35-45.

Downloads

Published

21-04-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Lu, Y., & Lei, L. (2025). The Coupling Relationship Between Language Landscape and Rural Revitalization: Taking Four Language and Writing Demonstration Villages in Huzhou as An Example. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 2(3), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.54097/xn15ej68