A Critical Evaluation of Otter as an Educational AI Tool: Insights from the UNESCO AI Competency Framework

Feiyu Qi

doi:10.54097/0s907b11

Authors

Feiyu Qi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/0s907b11

Keywords:

AI in education; Otter; AI ethics; inclusive bias; algorithmic explainability; educational inequality.

Abstract

This study conducts a critical evaluation of Otter, a widely used AI-powered transcription tool in educational contexts, through a five-dimensional framework grounded in UNESCO’s AI Competency Framework for Students. Focusing on the dimensions of ethics, inclusive bias, privacy, inequality, and explainability, the analysis reveals both the pedagogical value and the systemic risks associated with Otter's deployment. While the tool promotes accessibility and supports cognitive and instructional efficiency, it also presents unresolved issues related to data transparency, cultural inclusivity, and algorithmic accountability. This paper argues that current AI tools require more robust ethical governance and critical literacy to achieve equitable educational integration. The proposed framework not only bridges theoretical policy and classroom practice, but also offers practical insights for educators, developers, and policymakers seeking to evaluate and refine AI applications in education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] “Speaker Identification Overview,” Help Center, Feb. 27, 2024. https://help.otter.ai/hc/en-us/articles/21665587209367-Speaker-Identification-Overview (accessed May 17, 2025).

[2] UNESCO, AI competency framework for teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization., 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.54675/zjte2084.

[3] S. J. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach, 4th ed. London: Pearson, 2021.

[4] UNESCO, AI Competency Framework for Students. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization., 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.54675/jkjb9835.

[5] Beverly Park Woolf, Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.

[6] M. Wald, “Using Automatic Speech Recognition to Enhance Education for All Students: Turning a Vision into Reality,” Oct. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2005.1612286.

[7] W. Holmes, M. Bialik, and C. Fadel, “Artificial intelligence in education. promise and implications for teaching and learning.,” ResearchGate, Mar. 2019.

[8] J. L. Kröger, L. Gellrich, S. Pape, S. R. Brause, and S. Ullrich, “Personal information inference from voice recordings: User awareness and privacy concerns,” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, vol. 2022, no. 1, pp. 6–27, Nov. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/popets-2022-0002.

[9] A. Birhane, “Algorithmic injustice: a Relational Ethics Approach,” Patterns, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 100205, Feb. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.

[10] K. Holstein and S. Doroudi, “Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education: Will ‘AIEd’ Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education?,” Apr. 2021. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.12920

[11] W. Holmes and R. Luckin, Intelligence Unleashed: an Argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson, 2016.

[12] “Privacy & Security | Otter.ai,” Otter.ai, 2025. https://otter.ai/privacy-security?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed Jun. 06, 2025).

[13] V. Dignum, “The role and challenges of education for responsible AI,” London Review of Education, vol. 19, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.14324/lre.19.1.01.

[14] T. Walsh et al., “CLOSER TO THE MACHINE Technical, social, and legal aspects of AI,” Jan. 2019. Available: https://ovic.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/closer-to-the-machine-web.pdf

[15] N. Robinson, Perez Ogayo, D. R. Mortensen, and G. Neubig, “ChatGPT MT: Competitive for High- (but Not Low-) Resource Languages,” arXiv (Cornell University), pp. 392–418, Jan. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.wmt-1.40.

[16] M. Dawood, S. Tu, C. Xiao, H. Alasmary, M. Waqas, and S. U. Rehman, “Cyberattacks and Security of Cloud Computing: A Complete Guideline,” Symmetry, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1–33, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111981.

[17] N. Selwyn, Is technology good for education? Cambridge, Uk: Malden, Ma, 2016.

[18] M. Ribera and Àgata Lapedriza, “Can we do better explanations? A proposal of user-centered explainable AI,” IUI Workshops, Mar. 2019.