Task - Based Language Teaching in Junior High School Oral English Classrooms: An Analysis of Dilemmas and Countermeasures in Localized Practice - From the Perspective of Teachers

Authors

  • Ling Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/p0svvq74

Keywords:

Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT); junior high school oral English; localization dilemmas; teacher perspectives; instructional strategies.

Abstract

This paper explores the dilemmas faced by junior high school English teachers in implementing Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in oral English classrooms within the Chinese context and proposes context-adapted strategies from a teacher-centered perspective. Through a synthesis of existing literature, the study identifies four core dilemmas: the tension between TBLT’s process orientation and exam-driven instruction, inequitable participation in large classes, teachers’ limited competence in task design and facilitation, and the mismatch between textbook “authentic tasks” and students’ local realities. To address these challenges, the paper puts forward targeted strategies: designing exam-informed yet communicative tasks to align TBLT with formative assessment; adopting sequential role-based tasks to ensure equal participation in large classes; organizing school-based peer workshops to enhance teachers’ task design skills; and developing localized task banks rooted in students’ daily experiences. The study emphasizes that TBLT localization requires teachers to act as curriculum innovators rather than rigid implementers, highlighting the need for a flexible framework responsive to local constraints. These findings contribute to the discourse on TBLT adaptation in EFL contexts and provide practical insights for junior high school English teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.

[2] Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. Continuum.

[3] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

[4] Cheng, L., & Curtis, A. (2017). Washback of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning. In E. Hamp-Lyons & L. Cheng (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language testing (pp. 313–328). Routledge.

[5] Chen, L. (2020). Teacher assessment practices in task-based language teaching: A case study of Chinese junior high schools. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 7(2), 34–51.

[6] Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. Oxford University Press.

[7] Ellis, R. (2019). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

[8] Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

[9] Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–560.

[10] Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.

[11] Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

[12] Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

[13] Li, Y. (2020). Implementing task-based language teaching in Chinese secondary schools: Teachers’ challenges and coping strategies. Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(2), 36–54.

[14] Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). Challenges of implementing task-based language teaching in large EFL classes: A mixed-methods study. System, 105, 102828.

[15] Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

[16] Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.

[17] Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). English curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 edition). People’s Education Press.

[18] Tomlinson, B. (2013). Developing materials for task-based language teaching. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 353–376). Routledge.

[19] Wang, L., & Zhang, H. (2019). Task-based language teaching in Chinese junior high schools: A survey of teachers’ perceptions and practices. Foreign Language Teaching in Schools, 42(3), 23–28.

[20] Wen, Q., & Clément, R. (2003). Social psychology of second language acquisition. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 257–278). Blackwell Publishing.

[21] Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.

[22] Zhang, Q. (2021). The impact of high-stakes testing on TBLT implementation in oral English classes: A case study of junior high schools in Zhejiang. Foreign Language Education, 42(1), 68–73.

[23] Zhao, Y. (2020). Culturally responsive task design in TBLT: A case study of rural junior high schools in Sichuan. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 3, 56–63.

[24] Zhao, Y. (2020). The impact of localized task design on student engagement in rural junior high school oral English classes. Journal of Rural Education, 8(3), 56–68.

Downloads

Published

20-08-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, L. (2025). Task - Based Language Teaching in Junior High School Oral English Classrooms: An Analysis of Dilemmas and Countermeasures in Localized Practice - From the Perspective of Teachers. International Journal of Education and Social Development, 4(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.54097/p0svvq74